Thread:Boonerski/@comment-24142271-20160118091006/@comment-6516967-20160119160243

This sounds quite problematic but I'm afraid that disabling anonymous editing would discourage unregistered users to contribute since not all of them has the intention of vandalism, at least in my opinion. A handful of anon users before chimed with us some valuable 'raw' info unknown to us at the time. B'sides, all good editors started out as anonymous users.

So as some sort of a remedy to the situation, I'm planning in giving you administrative rights so instead of outright disabling anon editing, you can just block those users who do more harm than good in this wiki. That way at least the damage is "manageable".

Sound good to you?

But of course your suggestion does open some room for convinience and easy management, so I'm just asking if the alternative is okay for you...